Search found 2231 matches
- Thu May 04, 2023 3:26 pm
- Forum: ExamDiff Pro
- Topic: Bug: Run in new instance
- Replies: 15
- Views: 10425
Re: Bug: Run in new instance
Try the latest build, the change should be there.
- Tue May 02, 2023 3:09 pm
- Forum: ExamDiff Pro
- Topic: Bug: Run in new instance
- Replies: 15
- Views: 10425
Re: Bug: Run in new instance
You did, thanks for the details. Let me see if this if this is feasible and if it can be done in the next build of 14.0.
- Mon May 01, 2023 12:42 pm
- Forum: ExamDiff Pro
- Topic: Bug: Run in new instance
- Replies: 15
- Views: 10425
Re: Bug: Run in new instance
There should be a way to allow step 5 to override it. If you have different instances running different sessions, there's no way for them to know what's happening in the other. Change suggestion: Pre-populate both the file and directory fields with the currently active ones, but don't save them to ...
- Mon May 01, 2023 9:12 am
- Forum: ExamDiff Pro
- Topic: Bug: Run in new instance
- Replies: 15
- Views: 10425
Re: Bug: Run in new instance
After your step 4 the session you used was saved in the file comparison mode and with no information about the original directory comparison. Hence in step 7 that session did not know about those directories. On the other hand, you should easily be able to enter/browse to the folders in question.
- Tue Apr 25, 2023 8:12 am
- Forum: ExamDiff Pro
- Topic: Bug: Run in new instance
- Replies: 15
- Views: 10425
Re: Bug: Run in new instance
Thanks for confirming!
- Fri Apr 21, 2023 10:41 am
- Forum: Announcements
- Topic: ExamDiff Pro 14.0 Released!
- Replies: 0
- Views: 37152
ExamDiff Pro 14.0 Released!
Version 14.0 of ExamDiff Pro adds adds ability to match file structures (functions, classes, etc.), programming language detection, portable version, language support for Typescript and JSON, and more.
- Sat Apr 08, 2023 10:35 am
- Forum: ExamDiff Pro
- Topic: Support for COBOL
- Replies: 14
- Views: 8274
Re: Support for COBOL
While this is doable, regex parsers can be slow on large files, and generally are considered somewhat obsolete. Tree-sitter-based parsers, on the other hand, are compiled, which makes them a lot faster. The downside is, of course, that one has to white the code for a specific language. EDP uses Crys...
- Fri Apr 07, 2023 7:48 am
- Forum: ExamDiff Pro
- Topic: Support for COBOL
- Replies: 14
- Views: 8274
Re: Support for COBOL
It doesn't, it just makes the display of files prettier and easier to navigate.
- Thu Apr 06, 2023 3:51 pm
- Forum: ExamDiff Pro
- Topic: Support for COBOL
- Replies: 14
- Views: 8274
Re: Support for COBOL
We are talking about the same thing. We'd have to implement the whole COBOL parser (this is how EDP does syntax highlighting) in order to color keywords, detect comments etc.
- Thu Apr 06, 2023 11:38 am
- Forum: ExamDiff Pro
- Topic: Support for COBOL
- Replies: 14
- Views: 8274
Re: Support for COBOL
It means files with extensions not defined in Options | Doc Types and Default/Plain Text files.When you say "untyped" files, do you mean those with no extension?
- Thu Apr 06, 2023 11:11 am
- Forum: ExamDiff Pro
- Topic: Support for COBOL
- Replies: 14
- Views: 8274
Re: Support for COBOL
When you say "user-defined parsers", do you mean loading Tree-sitter parsers /if/ someone had managed to create one themselves? I mean any kind of a parser library we end up switching to (if and when this is going to happen). I'd have thought the effort involved in allowing users to suppl...
- Thu Apr 06, 2023 10:13 am
- Forum: ExamDiff Pro
- Topic: Support for COBOL
- Replies: 14
- Views: 8274
Re: Support for COBOL
Yes, we are well aware of these limitations and are constantly looking for alternatives to the parser engine we use. Tree-sitter is one alternative we are considering. As for user-defined parsers and language detectors, this is something we don't foresee in the immediate future.
- Wed Apr 05, 2023 1:46 pm
- Forum: ExamDiff Pro
- Topic: Support for COBOL
- Replies: 14
- Views: 8274
Re: Support for COBOL
While we don't plan on implementing COBOL syntax highlighting, you can define a custom document type for COBOL, as described at https://blog.prestosoft.com/2012/09/com ... f-pro.html . Unfortunately, the syntax highlighting library we use does not support COBOL.
- Fri Mar 10, 2023 10:30 am
- Forum: ExamDiff Pro
- Topic: Bug: Run in new instance
- Replies: 15
- Views: 10425
Re: Bug: Run in new instance
The latest build of 14.0 Beta contains the requested changes. Please give it a try.
- Fri Mar 10, 2023 9:32 am
- Forum: ExamDiff Pro
- Topic: Please update the following plugins (for next release)
- Replies: 92
- Views: 195469
Re: Please update the following plugins (for next release)
Thanks, will update.